ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Relationship between major cardiovascular system parameters and body mass index in adolescents of magadan region

Alyoshina OO, Suhanova AA, Averyanova IV
About authors

“Arctic” Research Center, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences, Magadan, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Olga O. Alyoshina
pr. Karla Marksa, 24, Magadan, 685000, Russia; moc.liamg@795aniselao

About paper

Funding: the study was conducted at the expense of budget financing of the “Arctic” Research Center, Far Eastern Branch RAS, under the theme “Study of Intersystem and Intrasystem Response Mechanisms in Formation of the “Northern Type” Human Body Functional Adaptive Reserves at Different Ontogeny Stages in Individuals Living in Uncomfortable and Extreme Environment Involving Determination of Integral Informative Health Indices” (ID АААА-А21-121010690002-2).

Author contribution: Khorosheva IV — study concept and design, data acquisition and processing, manuscript writing and editing.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was performed in accordance with the ethical principles for medical research involving human subjects enshrined in the Declaration of Helsinki (2013); the study protocol was approved by the Ethics Committee of the “Arctic” Research Center, Far Eastern Branch, Russian Academy of Sciences (report № 002/021 of 26 November 2021).

Received: 2023-09-18 Accepted: 2023-07-08 Published online: 2023-11-28
|

Anthropometry is among methods most widely used to assess body composition in epidemiology studies due to its ease of use, low cost, and high reliability relative to other human morphology evaluation methods [1]. Indicators of physical development obtained during anthropometric measurements enable estimation of adolescent’s development and health [2, 3]. It should be noted that the state and endurance of cardiovascular system also represent good predictors of health across the life-course that are inversely related to such morphological parameters, as body mass index (BMI), waist circumference, body weight (BW), body fat percentage, and skinfold thickness [47].

BMI is a synthetic direct indicator of the human body harmony and an indirect indicator of adequate diet and general health based on the ratio between BW and body length. BMI calculation is essential for detection of excess BW and obesity being important risk factors of a number of cardiometabolic disorders [8, 9].

It should be noted that adolescent obesity is strongly associated with multiple comorbidities [10], especially with cardiovascular and metabolic disorders [11, 12]. There is evidence that the increase in BW being a multifaceted process also affects the child’s body growth and development, as well as psychoemotional state [13]. Consequently, careful monitoring of BW and BMI throughout childhood and adolescence ontogeny periods can represent not only a method to detect excess weight and obesity, but also a simple and powerful method to prevent the disorders associated with the above, including reducing the risk of cardiovascular disorders in adults [9]. This subject is becoming particularly important due to the spread of obesity in this age group observed in the past decade [14]. Thus, according to global forecast, 268 and 124 million children and adolescents will be overweight or obese by 2025 [15]. It should be noted that a pronounced increase in the prevalence of these conditions in adolescents observed in the 20th century was followed by the increase in the prevalence of arterial hypertension (AH) and prehypertension [16].

Based on the foregoing, the study was aimed to evaluate and analyze the main cardiovascular system characteristics in the group of adolescent males living in the North considering their BMI.

METHODS

A total of 208 male Caucasian adolescents aged 15–16, who had comparable living conditions and were permanent residents of the Magadan Region, were assessed. Inclusion criteria: age 15–16 years, availability of the informed consent, health group 1–2. Exclusion criteria: history of chronic disease, being outside the age range, no informed consent. Assessment was performed in fall/winter 2022.

Basic somatometric characteristics were determined in the subjects: body length (cm) and BW (kg) that were used to calculate BMI (kg/m2) according to the following formula:

BMI = BW/BL2,

where BL was body length (cm), BW was body weight (kg). Differentiation of adolescents based on BMI involved taking into account the percentile ranges in accordance with the guidelines issued by the World Health Organization (WHO) [17].

The assessed sample was divided into three groups according to the WHO criteria: group 1 — underweight adolescents (n = 48, 23%) with the average age of 16.2 ± 0.0 years; group 2 — subjects with normal weight (n = 128, 62%) with the average age of 16.2 ± 0.1 years; group 3 included overweight adolescents (n = 32, 15%) with the average age of 16.2 ± 0.1 years.

The Nessei DS-1862 blood pressure monitor (Nissei; Japan) was used to measure systolic blood pressure (SBP, mmHg), diastolic blood pressure (DBP, mmHg), heart rate (HR, bpm) three times and calculate mean values. The following indicators were calculated based on the data obtained: rate-pressure product (RPP, AU), stroke volume (SV, mL), cardiac output (CO, mL/min), systemic vascular resistance (SVR, dyn s cm–5) [18].

Statistical processing of the results was performed using the Statistica 7.0 software package (StatSoft; USA). The distribution of measured variables was tested for normality using the Shapiro–Wilk test. The results of applying parametric methods were presented as mean (М) and error of the mean (± m). No preliminary calculation of the sample size was performed. Significance of differences was determined using the Student's t-test. The critical significance level (p) was set as 0.05.

RESULTS

The table provides the main cardiovascular system parameters and their values calculated in adolescent males living in the North based on their BMI. The results obtained show that 23% of subjects were underweight, 62% of adolescents had normal weight, and 15% were overweight. There were no significant differences in body length between the studied groups, which suggested that the samples were comparable.

The data provided show that overweight adolescent boys are characterized by significantly higher SBP, HR, SV, and CO values, as well as RPP, along with no significant intergroup differences in SVR. Optimal cardiovascular system characteristics in the form of the lowest HR and DBP values have been revealed in the group of individuals with normal weight. Underweight adolescents have significantly lower SBP, RPP, SV, and CO values. However, it should be noted that no differences in DBP and HR between groups with the weight deficit and normal weight have been revealed. When differentiating the studied groups based on the share of individuals with the high-normal blood pressure (HNBP) and AH based on SBP and SBP, it has been determined that such cardiovascular system abnormalities are most common in overweight adolescents.

DISCUSSION

The findings suggest that the lowest SBP values are typical for underweight adolescent boys, and the corresponding indicator grows in each subsequent group. The lowest DBP values are reported in the group with normal BW, while the highest values are observed in overweight individuals. It is well-known that excess BW and obesity detected in early childhood are likely to be found in adolescence and adulthood [19, 20], which increases the risk of cardiovascular disorders [21], type 2 diabetes mellitus and musculoskeletal disorders [22].

Differentiation of the assessed group by BP [23] showed that the share of individuals with HNBP and AH along with underweight based on SBP was 0% and 4%, while no similar deviations were revealed based on DBP. No individuals with HNBP based on SBP were found among adolescents with normal weight, the share of individuals with HNBP based on DBP was 5%, AH based on SBP was reported in 8% of adolescents, and AH based on DBP was found in 3%.

Among overweight adolescents, HNBP based on DBP was found in 6%, this group had the largest share of subjects with AH (25% based on SBP, 6% based on DBP).

Due to high prevalence, both arterial hypertension and obesity are considered to be a non-communicable pandemic [24]. We have interpreted the total rate of individuals with HNBP and AH based on SBP and DBP as strain on the cardiovascular system, it was 4% in the group of underweight adolescents, 16% in the group with the weight within normal range, 37%  in the sample characterized by excess BW.

SV reflects the amount of blood ejected by the ventricles with each contraction and depends on the body’s functional state [25]. Our findings show that the highest average SV values are typical for individuals with normal BW and the lowest values have been revealed in underweight individuals.

CO is the most important parameter determining blood flow. Adequate CO values suggest optimal oxygen supply to tissues and organs, which, in turn, is equivalent to cardiovascular health [26]. The highest CO values, being indirect indicators of energy metabolism, are typical for overweight adolescents. In this group high CO values result from higher HR and SV agaist the background of higher SBP relative to other assessed groups. High values of these parameters reflect the consumptive and energy-draining level of the cardiovascular system functioning [27]. The lowest CO values are typical for underweight adolescents.

SVR is a stationary component of cardiovascular system that ensures resistance to permanent blood flow and regulates the pressure gradient between the venous and arterial systems [28, 29]. The data obtained show that there are no intergroup differences in SVR.

RPP characterizes the cardiovascular system functional status and reflects the processes underlying its mechanical activity. It should be noted that RPP ≥ 100 AU is indicative of high heart energy production [30]. The RPP value close to the upper limit of normal range has been revealed in overweight adolescents, which reflect the increased need for myocardium in oxygen. At the same time, significantly lower RPP values have been revealed in the group of underweight individuals, which is indicative of the more energy-conserving and effective cardiovascular system functioning in this group.

Thus, all the assessed samples show the values of cardiovascular system parameters that correspond to normal ranges for these parameters, however, overweight individuals are characterized by strain on the cardiovascular system reflected in significantly higher SBP, HR, CO values. The correlation analysis results provided in figure are also indicative of strain on the cardiovascular system.

The data obtained by correlation analysis show that BMI has no effect on the cardiovascular system characteristics in the groups of underweight adolescents and adolescents with normal weight. Correlations have been revealed in overweight individuals: DBP and SV increase with increasing BMI. Furthermore, there is a weak negative correlation between BMI and SVR.

CONCLUSIONS

Thus, the findings show strain on the cardiovascular system in the group of overweight adolescents. The increase in strain on the cardiovascular system has been revealed, which is 4% in the group of underweight adolescents, 16% in the group with BW within normal range, 37% in the sample characterized by excess BW. It has been shown that the cardiovascular system of overweight adolescents functions more effectively, which is reflected in significantly higher SBP, HR, SV, and CO values observed against the background of enhanced by excess BW. It has been shown that the cardiovascular system of overweight adolescents functions more effectively, which is reflected in significantly higher SBP, HR, SV, and CO values observed against the background of enhanced processes underlying mechanical activity of the heart. This is well correlated to the correlation analysis results. The findings can be used to produce the guidelines aimed at managing excess BW in the group of individuals being through the adolescent ontogeny period as a target group for health promotion and applying preventive measures.

КОММЕНТАРИИ (0)