2022 / 02

Next Paper
DOI: 10.24075/rbh.2022.047

ORIGINAL RESEARCH

Regime of using mobile electronic devices by students as a risk factor of vision impairment

Markelova SV, Mettini E, Tatarinchik AA, Ievleva OV
About authors

Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia

Correspondence should be addressed: Olga V. Ievleva
Ostrovityanov str., 1, Moscow, 117997, Russia; ur.ay@lvei-looc

About paper

Author contribution: all authors contributed to manuscript preparation equally.

Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the Ethics Commitee of Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (protocol № 159 of 21 November 2016), did not endanger the subjects, and was consistent with the principles of biomedical ethics; the informed consent was submitted by all study participants.

Received: 2022-04-23 Accepted: 2022-05-29 Published online: 2022-06-30
|
  1. The State of the World’s Children 2017: Children in a Digital World [Electronic resource]. — UNICEF. 2017; 211 p. URL: https://www.unicef.org/publications/index_101992.html (date of application: 06.05.2021).
  2. Mukhametzyanov IS. Mobile technologies in digital education: medical aspects. Scientific notes of IUO RAO. 2018; 3 (67): 116– 119. Russian.
  3. Anikina EI. Prospects for the use of mobile devices for the implementation of e-learning technologies in higher education. Innovations in education. 2019; 6: 83–91. Russian.
  4. Diev OG. The use of electronic educational resources and mobile devices in the educational process in support of the teacher. Education and problems of society development. 2021; 1 (14): 42–46. Russian.
  5. Bulycheva EV. Hygienic assessment of educational loads in modern students. Russian Bulletin of Hygiene. 2021; (4): 12–20. DOI: 10.24075/rbh.2021.025. Russian.
  6. Sokolova AI, Yaskova EE. The impact of modern information technologies on the health of schoolchildren. Russian Bulletin of Hygiene. 2021; (2): 40–4. DOI: 10.24075/rbh.2021.015. Russian.
  7. Popov VI, Melikhova EP. The study and methodology of the study of the quality of life of students. Hygiene and sanitation. 2016; 95 (9): 879–884. Russian.
  8. Popov MV, Libina II, Melikhova EP. Assessment of the influence of gadgets on the psycho-emotional state of students. Youth Innovation Bulletin. 2019; 8 (2): 676–678. Russian.
  9. Vyatleva OA, Kurgansky AM. Modes of using a mobile phone and the health of school-age children. Hygiene and sanitation. 2019; 98 (8): 857–862. DOI 10.18821/0016–9900–2019–98–8– 857–862. Russian.
  10. Zaitseva TA, Shapovalova AV, Bedanokova RA, et al. The impact of modern gadgets and personal computers on human health. Eurasian Scientific Association. 2019; 6–3 (52): 183–186. Russian.
  11. Toncheva KS, Bykova NL, Sarchuk EV. The impact of modern gadgets on the health of school-age children: aspects of the problem. Scientific review. Medical sciences. 2020; 3: 29–33. Russian.
  12. Izmailova MA. Digital addiction and digital culture: Search for solutions in education. Innovations in education. 2020; 4: 50–64.
  13. Markov M, Grigoriev Y. Protect children from EMF. Electromagn Biol Med. 2015; 34 (3): 251–6. DOI: 10.3109/15368378.2015.1077339.
  14. Grigoriev YuG, Samoilov AS, Bushmanov AYu, et al. Mobile communication and children’s health: the problem of the third millennium. Medical radiology and radiation safety. 2017; 2 (68): 39–46. Russian.
  15. Goncharova GA. Neuropsychiatric health of children — active users of digital tools. Russian Bulletin of Hygiene. 2021; (3): 33–5. DOI: 10.24075/rbh.2021.017 Russian.
  16. Novikova II, Zubtsovskaya NA, Romanenko SP, Kondrashchenko AI, Lobkis MA. Investigation of the influence of mobile communication devices on the health of children and adolescents. Human Science: Humanitarian Studies. 2020; (2): 95–103. Russian.
  17. Milushkina OYu, Skoblina NA, Markelova SV, et al. Assessing health risks for schoolchildren and students caused by exposure to educational and entertaining information technologies. Health Risk Analysis. 2019; 3: 135–143. DOI 10.21668/health. risk/2019.3.16.eng.
  18. Nakamura Y, Hosobe H. A Japanese bimanual flick keyboard for tablets that improves display space efficiency. VISIGRAPP 2020 — Proceedings of the 15th International Joint Conference on Computer Vision, Imaging and Computer Graphics Theory and Applications [Internet]. 2020; 170–177. DOI: 10.5220/0008969101700177.
  19. Gleeson BT, Provancher WR. Mental rotation of tactile stimuli: Using directional haptic cues in mobile devices. IEEE Trans Haptic. 2013; 6 (3): 330–339. DOI:10.1109/TOH.2013.5.
  20. Meschtscherjakov A, Strumegger S, Trösterer S. Bubble margin: Motion sickness prevention while reading on smartphones in vehicles. Human-Computer Interaction — INTERACT 2019. 2019; 660–667. DOI: 10.1007/978–3–030–29384–0_39.
  21. Tennison JL, Carril ZS, Giudice NA, et al. Comparing haptic pattern matching on tablets and phones: Large screens are not necessarily better. Optom Vis Sci. 2018; 95 (9): 720–726. DOI:10.1097/OPX.0000000000001274.
  22. Dobres J, Wolfe B, Chahine N, et al. The effects of visual crowding, text size, and positional uncertainty on text legibility at a glance. Appl Ergon. 2018; 70: 240–246. DOI: 10.1016/j. apergo.2018.03.007.
  23. Ievleva OV. Hygienic assessment of the mode of use of mobile electronic devices by medical students. Russian Bulletin of Hygiene. 2021; (3): 18–22. DOI: 10.24075/rbh.2021.023 Russian.
  24. Kuchma VR, Barsukova NK, Sankov SV. An integrated approach to hygienic rationing of children’s use of electronic learning tools. Healthcare of the Russian Federation. 2020; 64 (3): 139–149. DOI 10.46563/0044–197X-2020–64–3–139–149. Russian.
  25. Makarova LV, Lukyanets GN. Gadgets and their use by students in extracurricular activities. New research. 2019; 1 (57): 15–24. Russian.
  26. Milushkina OYu, Popov VI, Skoblina NA, et al. The use of electronic devices by students, parents and teachers before and after the transition to distant learning. Bulletin of Russian State Medical University. 2020; 3: 77–82.
  27. Popov VI, Milushkina OYu, Skoblina NA, et al. Behavioral health risks of students during distance learning. Hygiene and sanitation. 2020; 99 (8): 854–860. DOI: 10.47470/0016–9900–2020–99–8– 854–860. Russian.
  28. Lopatina OA, Efremov DS. Consequences of critically constructed interactions with smartphones in a pandemic. Human health, theory and methodology of physical culture and sports. 2020; 4 (20): 34–41. Russian.
  29. Shcherbakova VV, Khabibullin AB. Introduction of interactive forms of learning using smartphones. Questions of pedagogy. 2020; 10(1): 251–254. Russian.
  30. Clark AJ, Yang P, Khaderi KR, et al. Ocular tolerance of contemporary electronic display devices. Ophthalmic Surg Lasers Imaging Retina. 2018; 49 (5): 346–54. DOI:10.3928/23258160– 20180501–08.
  31. Lee D, Hong S, Jung S, et al. The effects of viewing smart devices on static balance, oculomotor function, and dizziness in healthy adults. Med Sci Monit. 2019; 25: 8056–60. DOI:10.12659/ MSM.915284.
  32. Zemlyanoi DA, Lvov SN, Brzhesky VV, et al. Features of the organization of the daily routine and the dynamics of refraction changes in elementary school students of St. Petersburg. Pediatrician. 2018; 9 (6): 45–50. DOI: 10.17816/PED9645–50. Russian.
  33. Novikova II, Gavrish SM, Zubtsovskaya NA, et al. Assessment of the health status and academic performance of students under restrictions on the use of mobile communications. Global problems of our time. 2020; 1 (10–12): 11–14. Russian.
  34. Novikova II, Romanenko SP, Lobkis MA, et al. The functional state of the adaptation system of schoolchildren studying under conditions of limited use of mobile communication devices. Science for Education Today. 2020; 10 (5): 178–196. Russian.
  35. Novikova II, Yurk DE, Sorokina AV, et al. Hygienic assessment of the impact of restrictions in the use of cell phones on the motor activity and health of schoolchildren. Public health and habitat. 2020; 8 (329): 10–14. Russian.