This article is an open access article distributed under the terms and conditions of the Creative Commons Attribution license (CC BY).
ORIGINAL RESEARCH
Assessment of physical development harmonicity in schoolchildren from the new Russian territories
1 Pavlov Ryazan State Medical University, Ryazan, Russia
2 Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University, Moscow, Russia
Correspondence should be addressed: Valentina A. Paramonova
Slavyansky Prospekt, 6, Ryazan, 390035, Russia; ur.xednay@5002avonomarapv
Author contribution: Paramonova VA — development of the study concept, collection of the primary material, processing of the research results, text authoring; Chudinin NV — statistical processing; Dementiev AA, Skoblina NA — text editing; Semicheva VR, Tatarinchik AA — collection of the primary material, statistical processing.
Compliance with ethical standards: the study was approved by the local Ethics Committee of the Pirogov Russian National Research Medical University (Minutes No. 239 of 15 April 2024) and conducted in accordance with generally accepted scientific principles of the Declaration of Helsinki (revision of 2013).
Physical development, being the child's condition control tool, is on of the most important indicators of the health of children and adolescents [1, 2]. The degree of harmonicity of the physique reflects how well-balanced the processes of growth and development are, and describes the activity of metabolism in the context of the body-environment interaction at any age [1, 2]. The basic figures used in the physical development assessment are the anthropometric data [1, 2]. The assessment itself involves a comparison of these figures with those considered standards at the regional, national, and international levels. Most researchers believe it is best to prioritize regional standards, since they factor in the specifics of the given territory (climatogeographic, ethnic, ecological, socio-economic conditions, etc.) [3, 4].
On September 30, 2022, there were signed international agreements admitting the new regions to the Russian Federation (RF). In this regard, the physical development of children and adolescents there is of interest to both scientists and healthcare professionals [5].
The purpose of this study was to assess the harmonicity of physical development of schoolchildren in the new territories of the Russian Federation.
METHODS
The study relied on the anthropometric data (body length and weight) of schoolchildren aged 7 to 17 years from the Donetsk People's Republic (DPR; 4004 people) and the Kherson region (2902 people). The data were taken from the official medical documentation (preventive medical examination cards for minors, Form No. 030-PO/u-17). The schoolchildren were divided into three age periods: 7−10 years old, 11−14 years old and 15−17 years old, according to the age division practiced in the Russian Federation. The assessment of the physical development of schoolchildren was based on the regional age and sex modified body length-dependent weight regression scales [6, 7]. The study yielded a conclusion describing how harmonious (disharmonious) the physical development of schoolchildren in the new Russian territories is [6, 7].
For statistical processing of the obtained data, we used the Statistica 13 software package (StatSoft; USA) and Excel 2016 (Microsoft; USA). The mathematical analysis of the data involved calculation of the statistical indicators using methods of descriptive statistics. Since the analyzed indicators are attributive and measured on a nominal scale, we represented them as calculated proportions — how often each occurs in the sample — and determined the 95% confidence Wilson score intervals. To analyze the attributive data on a nominal scale, we used the four-field conjugacy tables and calculated the Pearson's chi-square criterion (χ2), the relative risk (RR), and its 95% confidence interval. The critical significance level for all statistical methods (criteria) used was p ≤ 0.05.
RESULTS
More than 60% of schoolchildren in the DPR had harmonious physical development; the smallest number of harmoniously developed children was observed in the age group of 11−14 years (58.4% boys and 56.6% girls) (table).
In the Kherson region, physical development was harmonious in over 50% of schoolchildren; the largest number of disharmonious development cases was registered in the 11−14 years age group (43.1% boys and 45.3% girls).
In DPR, the common reason behind the disharmonious physical development in the 7−10 years age was short stature, registered in 14.3% of boys and 16.2% of girls; it may indicate a possible delay in biological development. The main reason in the 11−14 years age group was excess body weight, seen in 18.3% of boys and 18.7% of girls. In the 15−17 years age group, disharmonious physical development stemmed from insufficient body weight in boys (25.5%) and excess body weight in girls (15.0%).
In the Kherson region, the key reason for disharmonious physical development in the 7−10 years age group was excess body weight in boys (21.6%) and insufficient body weight in girls (16.3%). In the 11−14 years age group, it was also excess body weight in boys (28.0%) and insufficient body weight in girls (19.7%). As for the 15−17 years age group, the common reason behind disharmonious physical development was excess body weight, found in 20.8% of boys and 15.8% of girls.
Assessing the conjugacy of age groups in DPR and calculating the RR of disharmonious development, we identified significant differences between male schoolchildren aged 7−10 and 11−14 years (χ2 = 9.841, p < 0.05), and schoolchildren aged 11−14 and 15−17 years (χ2 = 6.272, p < 0.05). The RR of disharmonious physical development in boys from DPR belonging to the 11−14 years age group exceeded that in other age groups by 1.3 and 1.2 times, respectively (RR = 1.308 (1.104−1.551) and RR = 1.248 (1.047−1.489)); in girls aged 11−14 years, the RR was also 1.3 times higher than in the 15−17 years age group (RR = 1.423 (1.171−1.722)).
In the Kherson region, we revealed significant gender differences in the degree of disharmonious physical development among schoolchildren aged 11−14 and 15−17 years (χ2 = 13.044, p < 0.001 and χ2 = 16.618, p < 0.01, respectively). The RR in boys and girls aged 11−14 years was 1.2 and 1.4 times higher than in the 15−17 years age group, respectively (RR = 1.248 (1.047−1.489), (RR = 1.403 (1.155−1.706)).
The assessment of RR of disharmonious physical development in the same-age schoolchildren (both boys and girls) from DPR and the Kherson region revealed no significance of gender as a risk factor.
We identified significant differences in the causes of RR of disharmonious physical development between boys aged 7−10 and 11−14 in DPR and the Kherson region (χ2 = 21.6, p < 0.001 and χ2 = 59.328, p < 0.001, respectively), and between girls in similar age groups (χ2 = 14.383, p < 0.001 and χ2 = 11.843, p < 0.001). The RR indicators of schoolchildren in DPR and the Kherson region confirm the direct link between the territories they reside in and the likelihood of disharmonious physical development: in boys aged 7−10 and 11−14 years from the Kherson region, the said likelihood was 1.5 and 1.4 times higher, respectively, than for in their peers from DPR (RR = 1.526 (1.278−1.821) and RR = 1.367 (1.201−1.557)). In the Kherson region, girls aged 7−10 and 11−14 had a 1.4 and 1.3 times higher risk of disharmonious development than girls in DPR, respectively (RR = 1.407 (1.180−1.677) and RR = 1.268 (1.109−1.450)).
DISCUSSION
Stature and body weight are the main anthropometric indicators traditionally used in pediatric practice to assess physical development [1, 2]. Deviations of these parameters from the age standards indicate the need for a more extensive examination, and further on − planning and implementation of preventive and health improvement programs, including those designed specifically for the premises of the educational institution [8].
In a population of children, adolescents and youth who grow and develop in favorable conditions, the proportion of children with normal (harmonious) physical development approaches 68% (consistent with the normal distribution law) [9].
Earlier studies that involved schoolchildren from Moscow and Kiev found the share of normally developed people in these populations to be exactly that number [10].
However, in our study, we discovered a fairly large proportion of schoolchildren with disharmonious physical development.
As reported in the scientific literature, 2 to 3 percent of children show a delay in biological development of various origins, regardless of gender. At the same time, the high prevalence of overweight and obesity among minors (about 27.1%) is a matter both Russian and foreign specialists are concerned about [11−16].
We found that 14.3% of boys and 16.2% of girls from the 7-10 years age group (DPR) had a short stature, which may indicate a possible delay in biological development.
Excess body weight was the predominant sign of disharmonious physical development among boys in all age groups from the Kherson region (21.6, 28.0 and 20.8%, respectively) and in the 11−14 years age groups among boys from DPR (18.3%), as well as among girls of the Kherson region aged 15−17 years (15.8%) and girls from DPR aged 11−14 years and 15−17 years (18.7% and 15.0%, respectively).
Body weight deficiency was less common; we registered it in older boys from DPR (25.3%) and in girls of younger and middle age groups from the Kherson region (16.3 and 19.7%, respectively).
The correlation analysis and calculation of the RR showed that age was a factor in disharmonious physical development in the 11−14 years age group, regardless of gender and territory of residence; this is comparable with the results of other studies, because this is the puberty age, when the entire body undergoes rapid transformation [1, 2]. The greatest risk of disharmonious development occurs at the age of 11−14 years, which is a sensitive period associated with the most active changes in the adolescent's body.
A long-term analysis of the dynamics of physical development of children and adolescents indicates a direct dependence of their health status on environmental and socio-economic factors present in their territory of residence [17]. This study revealed differences between the studied territories: the indicators of disharmonious physical development of schoolchildren in the Kherson region were higher than those in DPR. At the same time, correlation analysis and RR calculation point to a direct relationship between the specifics of the territories and the likelihood of disharmonious physical development in younger children and those in the medium age groups of the sample.
The current scientific publications lack sufficient information on the level of physical development and health of the child population in the new territories of the Russian Federation. Therefore, further research in this area will help practical healthcare in planning science-based preventive measures. Thus, it is necessary to continue studying children, adolescents and youth residing in the said regions [18].
CONCLUSIONS
This study investigated level of physical development of schoolchildren in the new Russian territories using regional age-sex modified stature-dependent body weight regression scales. We identified deviations in physical development (short stature, overweight and underweight), and the correlation analysis and calculation of the relative risk defined the "critical groups" of schoolchildren aged 11−14 years that included the largest number of people with disharmonious physical development.